Legal Opinion

Paton v. Teeter

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1940No. Civ. 10999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a general demurrer, without leave to amend, to a petition for a writ of mandate to compel a county auditor to draw his warrant for a specified sum as a refund of deposited bail. The question involved is whether a writ of mandate is an appropriate remedy. The facts applicable to this petition will be found in Paton v. Superior Court, Civil No. 11187 (ante, p. 475 [99 Pac. (2d) 698]), filed this date.

The. point suggested by this court after the first oral argument, and considered upon the second oral argument and subsequently in briefs, is, assuming…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kirschbaum v. MaynMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Paton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Butler v. HastingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brittan Holland v. Kelly RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API