Legal Opinion

Osborn v. Butler

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 11, 2010No. Case CV 09-071-S-CWDPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

CANDY W. DALE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I

Introduction

Plaintiff Michael Osborn alleges that Defendants Kevin Bulter, Gary Deulen, and Steve Hopkins violated his procedural due process rights by falsifying a polygraph examination and failing to correct the mistake, and that others relied upon the false polygraph report to Plaintiffs detriment at his parole hearing in 2004 and a sentencing hearing in 2007. There are three motions pending before the Court. First, Defendants Bulter, Deulen, and Hopkins moved for summary judgment with respect to Plaintiffs civil…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. David Thompson v. Bank of America N.A., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  2. Berle A. Cullum v. Judge Joseph W. Borton, Prosecuting Attorney, Idaho Parole CommissionDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
  3. David Thompson v. Bank of America N.A., etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Waste Action Project v. Girard Resources & Recycling LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Wilson v. WakemanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API