State v. Superior Court
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
An order of the respondent court granting a motion to compel disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant is the subject of this special action. The State’s position is that it was error to require disclosure where the informant’s only role in the entire matter was to provide the law enforcement officers with sufficient information to constitute probable cause to search.
The respondent court, in granting the motion to disclose, reviewed the disclosure materials of the respective parties and found that the police officers had conducted a warrantless search…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- James Riley, Jr., and Frank Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- State v. PenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985