Legal Opinion
James Riley, Jr., and Frank Marshall v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1969No. 22511PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McNICHOLS, District Judge:
Appellants, James Riley, Jr. and Frank Marshall (hereinafter referred to respectively as “Riley” or “Marshall”) were each convicted by jury verdict on both counts of a joint two count indictment. The first count charged a conspiracy by the two men to receive, conceal and transport an illegally imported narcotic substance, i. e., heroin. The second count charged the receipt, concealment and transportation of the heroin all in violation of Sections 173 and 174, Title 21, United States Code. Concurrent ten year sentences were meted out.
The principal errors relied on in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. SomersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. James Earl Fleming, Jr., Henry Lee Fleming and Tommie Earl MillenderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- State v. NordquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Donald Elroy Goodrich, United States of America v. Rex LefevreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.