Jones v. RCA Music Service
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss this pro se complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim. For the reasons which follow, the motion will be granted.
Plaintiff Hayden Carl Jones alleges that defendants sent collection letters to “Joe Jones” stating that Joe Jones had agreed to buy records from defendant RCA Music Service (“RCA”) and was in default on account. One letter was sent by RCA and signed by “John Stormont,” a fictitious named used by RCA on collection letters. The other was sent by RCA’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Novack Investment Company, Etc. v. Chester W. SetserSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gaetano v. Sharon Herald Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Ralph J. Paolino v. Channel Home Centers and Air Control Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Diane T. MANNING, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. GriffithsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- General Electric Co. v. Sargent & LundyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Kanengiser v. KanengiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Klauder & Nunno Enterprises, Inc. v. Hereford Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.