Legal Opinion
United States v. Articles of Drug Labeled in Part "Quick-O-Ver"
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 20, 1967No. Civ. 17849PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
“Quiek-O-ver for Hang-O-ver” is such a catchy slogan that Locke Chemical Company, licensee of the trademark and claimant herein, is anxious to put out some sort of compound which can be distributed nationally using that slogan. Its first product was the subject of a complaint for forfeiture under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., filed herein by the government in May 1966. For reasons which are not important in the present case, the parties agreed, with the approval of the court, that the shipment involved in this case, Civil No. 17301,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- 62 Cases of Jam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LenrootSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. 354 BULK CARTONS, ETC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Tutoki v. CelebrezzeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. 41 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Naremco, Inc., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Articles of Drug Consisting of the Following: 5,906 Boxes, Etc., United States of America v. Alcon Laboratories (Puerto Rico), Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. An Article of Drug "Bentex Ulcerine"Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Hanson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1976
- United States v. X-Otag Plus TabletsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.