Pele v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge.
The Court must decide whether the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (“Defendant” or “PHEAA”) is an “arm of the state” of Pennsylvania, such that it would enjoy immunity from suit under the Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution. Now before the Court is PHEAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment on that affirmative defense of immunity, [Dkt. 57], and Plaintiff Lee Pele’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Pele”) cross-motion for Partial Summary Judgment, [Dkt. 68]. For the following reasons, the Court holds that PHEAA is an arm of the state of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joshua Thurston v. Equifax Information Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020