Sabin v. Acme Inv. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). If the $5,000 paid by the lessee at the time of executing the lease was a mere advancement to secure the faithful performance of the covenants of the lease, the lessee or his successor in interest was entitled to a return of the money thus advanced, upon the determination' of the lease, less the amount' of any rent due and unpaid at the time of such determination. But, if the $5,000 was paid as a consideration for the execution of the lease, no part of that consideration was recoverable, either by the lessee or by the trustee in bankruptcy. We think all the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Yuen Suey v. FleshmanOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Alvord v. BanfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Dutton v. ChristieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Ramish v. WorkmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- Seattle Rialto Theatre Co. v. HeritageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Cloudy Realty Corp. v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934