Dorothy I. YUHAS and Nancy Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LIBBEY-OWENS-FORD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether an employer’s rule that a present employee’s spouse may not be hired in a similar capacity violates the antidiscrimination provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. The district court found a violation. We take a contrary view and reverse.
I
Defendant Libbey-Owens-Ford Company operates two plants in Ottawa, Illinois. The company has a rule against hiring an hourly employee at these plants when the applicant’s spouse is already employed there in the same capacity. The rule was promulgated at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States of America v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dottie D. Jernigan Bryant and Theresa O. Lillibridge, in No. 81-1558 v. International Schools Services, Inc., in No. 81-1559Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Kraft, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ernestine KING, Appellant, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Thomson v. Sanborn's Motor Express, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.