Legal Opinion

Dorothy I. YUHAS and Nancy Anderson, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LIBBEY-OWENS-FORD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 28, 1977No. 77-1143PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether an employer’s rule that a present employee’s spouse may not be hired in a similar capacity violates the antidiscrimination provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. The district court found a violation. We take a contrary view and reverse.

I

Defendant Libbey-Owens-Ford Company operates two plants in Ottawa, Illinois. The company has a rule against hiring an hourly employee at these plants when the applicant’s spouse is already employed there in the same capacity. The rule was promulgated at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dothard v. RawlinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States of America v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dottie D. Jernigan Bryant and Theresa O. Lillibridge, in No. 81-1558 v. International Schools Services, Inc., in No. 81-1559Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. Sharp v. Tulsa County Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Kraft, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Ernestine KING, Appellant, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  5. Thomson v. Sanborn's Motor Express, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API