Legal Opinion

William Leighton v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, Barney Balaban, Edwin Weisl and Paul E. Manheim

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 1965No. 14, Docket 28831PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Circuit Judge:

On October 8, 1963, Leighton (appellant) began a shareholder’s derivative action by filing a vague and conclusory complaint which appeared to charge that the individual defendants, directors of Paramount Pictures Corporation, wasted corporate assets and plundered the corporate treasury. Leighton requested that various sums paid by Paramount be recovered from the individual defendants, that a receiver be appointed for Paramount, that various contracts to which Paramount was a party be can-celled, and that an injunction be issued against further payments by it without the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. Minniola O. Miller v. The Town of SuffieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. Leslie One-Stop in Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Audiofidelity, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. John Hawes, Etc. v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante, Nancy Kreitzer v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc., Daniel Ventura v. El Conquistador HotelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. Entel v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  3. Selletti v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Klein v. Spear, Leeds & KelloggDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Selletti v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API