Legal Opinion

Ryals v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1999No. A99A1118PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Terrence Antonio Ryals appeals from his conviction of burglary of a business, contending there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction. We affirm.

On appeal the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to support the verdict, and [Ryals] no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court determines evidence sufficiency and does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility. The verdict must be upheld if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Madge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Ellis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Honeycutt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Duren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API