Honeycutt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Presiding Judge.
Following a jury trial, Ricky Honeycutt appeals his convictions of two counts of child molestation, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions. Honeycutt also contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying his request for a complete copy of the files from the Department of Family & Children Services (DFACS); (2) denying his request that preliminary jury instructions be given to the jury at the commencement of trial; and (3) prematurely giving an Allen 1 charge to the jury. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.
On appeal the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Ramos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Rubi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Dodd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.