Legal Opinion

Kelsey v. Drushella-Klohk NCE

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 1994No. 91-10681, 91-14721; CA A79650PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board in this consolidated proceeding to determine whether Duane Drushella and Joan Klohk-Drushella (respondents) are noncomplying employers and whether claimant’s claim is compensable. ORS 656.740(4).

Claimant was injured when he fell from the roof of a house that he was remodeling for respondents, who had purchased the house as a vacation home. Although respondents had never lived in the house at the time claimant was injured, they had rented it to a third party on one occasion, in payment for that party’s cabinetry work.

After…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zurich Insurance v. Diversified Risk ManagementOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Argonaut Insurance v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Mosley v. Sacred Heart HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clelland v. CilioneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API