Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Saroff

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1990No. 88 Civ. 3716 (RWS)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Steven Saroff (“Saroff”) has moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment or in the alternative, partial summary judgment to dismiss the claims of either plaintiff Wallie Cooper Simpson (“Simpson”) or plaintiff Lower East Side International Community School, Inc. (“LESICS”) separately. For the reasons set forth below the motion is denied. Parties

Simpson is the principal and director of LESICS which, prior to its eviction, operated out of a building at 203 Rivington Street in the borough of Manhattan.

Saroff is a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Esmont v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Matthews v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. Doe v. HeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Usavage v. Port AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. United States v. Wayne BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API