Legal Opinion

William H. Coates v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 10, 1959No. 15203_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant pro se sought relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Without a hearing his motion was denied with a notation by the District Judge: “The court finds and certifies that the motion and the files and the records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. The motion is therefore denied.” His petition in the District Court to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis was likewise denied. We allowed an appeal and appointed counsel.

28 U.S.C. § 2255 reads in pertinent part:

“Unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. George A. Watts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  2. David Frank Spanbauer v. John C. Burke, Warden, Wisconsin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. Martin Joseph McNicholasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Gerald L. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. Donald Ray Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API