Legal Opinion
Canal Insurance v. Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 1, 2010No. 10-60196PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
An MCS-90 endorsement to an automotive insurance policy obligates an insurer to cover an insured’s negligence involving “vehicles subject to the financial responsibility requirements of ... the Motor Carrier Act.” The Motor Carrier Act, in turn, creates minimum levels of financial responsibility “for the transportation of property by motor carrier ... within the United States.” Plaintiff-appellee Canal Insurance Company seeks a declaratory judgment that the MCS-90 endorsement does not cover an accident where the truck involved was not engaged in the transportation of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- King v. DoganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Boelens v. Redman Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Murray v. EarleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Osherow v. Ernst & Young, LLP (In Re Intelogic Trace, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Lyons v. Lancer InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Burciaga v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Jackson v. WiseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Canal Insurance v. YMV Transport, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2011
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.