Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lord

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2006No. 2006-0463PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, John Albert Lord of North Royalton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0072696, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 2000.

{¶ 2} On September 13, 2005, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, filed an amended complaint charging respondent with multiple violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Respondent filed an answer to the complaint, and a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline held a hearing on the complaint in November 2005. The panel then prepared written findings of fact and conclusions of law, which the board adopted, as well as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stark County Bar Ass'n v. MarkOhio Supreme Court · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. MathewsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Cincinnati Bar Association v. HoskinsOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. LordOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API