Legal Opinion
In re Simpson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 29, 2007No. 2007-B-0070PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
2Per curiam
11This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Joseph H. Simpson, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana.
UNDERLYING FACTS
Respondent is the subject of two separate sets of formal charges, consisting of a total of three counts, which were consolidated for hearing before the hearing committee. All of the charges arise out of the same operative facts, and many of these facts have been stipulated to by respondent and the ODC.
By way of background, Mrs. Betty Kin-chen Bankston…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Darien D. Lester.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- In Re: William MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
- In Re: William MageeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2019
- In re SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008