Legal Opinion

Tralich v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 4, 1914No. 2856PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At Law. Action by Mike Tralich against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company. On motion to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

This action was commenced in the state court and removed to this court on petition of the defendant. *676Motion to remand has been made on the part of the plaintiff. The complaint (paragraph 2) alleges:

“That defendant in tile carrying on.of interstate commerce employed tbe plaintiff as a common laborer to work upon a construction gang in tbe repair and maintenance of tbe tracks and roadbed of tbe said defendant company, wbicb were employed for tbe transportation and movement of defendant’s trains in tbe conduct of its business.”

And in paragraph 3 that:

“While * * * employed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Garrett v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. ChojnackyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Jackson v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. LeinenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Prink v. Longview, Portland & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Eley v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API