Legal Opinion

J. M. Huber Corp. v. Holliday

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 23, 1997No. A97A1647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

We granted J. M. Huber Corporation’s application for discretion ary appeal to review an award of workers’ compensation benefits t< *5liarry Holliday based on the “superadded injury” theory. Huber contends that the ALJ misapplied this theory in an attempt to find coverage where the claim was not otherwise compensable.

The following facts are not in dispute: Holliday suffered a compensable injury to his left knee in 1985. He was assigned a 16 percent permanent partial disability rating and was given a mostly seden;ary job which never required stress on the knee. Although he had some…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hallisey v. Fort Howard Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Holt's Bakery v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Slattery Associates, Inc. v. HufstetlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. ITT CONTINENTAL BANKING COMPANY v. ComesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lowndes County Board of Commissioners v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. City of Atlanta v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API