Cummings v. Future Nissan
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
Plaintiff Shellie Cummings filed this action for damages from an allegedly wrongful dismissal from her employment with defendant Future Nissan. The defendant answered and successfully moved to compel arbitration pursuant to a two-tiered procedure contained in her employment contract. Although the initial arbitration award was in the plaintiff’s favor, upon a second-level review the “appellate” arbitrator reversed the initial award and found in favor of the defendant. The trial court issued an order granting the defendant’s motion to confirm the award and denying the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Green v. Ralee Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. ElderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Jenks v. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cooper v. Lavely & Singer Professional Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.