Legal Opinion

Lichtenthaler v. Clow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHabeis, J.

The following was the instruction given by the court:

“I instruct you if you find that the plaintiff is entitled to recover, the measure of damages would be such proportion of the purchase price, which in this case would be six thousand dollars, as the deficiency bears to the represented area. In other words, the measure of damages is the amount paid for the deficiency, irrespective of the real value of the tract actually conveyed.”

The bill of exceptions is in the short form, and, although brief, it contains all the evidence necessary for presenting the question as to whether or not the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Cawston v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Van De Wiele v. GarbadeOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Stow v. Bozeman's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Caples v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Purdy v. UnderwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Selman v. ShirleyOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Heise v. Pilot Rock Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Libby Creek Logging, Inc. v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Tysk v. GriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Howard v. MerrickOregon Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API