Legal Opinion

State v. Rochelt

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 31, 1991No. 90-1402-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.

Richard Rochelt appeals from a judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, sec. 161.41(l)(c)l., Stats. The state relies upon sec. 939.05, Stats., the party to the crime statute, since it presented no evidence that Rochelt directly committed *377the crime. The state's theory is that on December 24, 1988, undercover agent Pat Buckley bought cocaine from Rochelt through a bartender, Dale Tuel.

The first issue is whether the trial judge should have recused himself. The second issue is whether the court properly allowed Buckley to testify to statements implicating Rochelt that Tuel,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harrison Franklin v. Gary R. McCaughtry WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  2. State v. PinnoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Jesse L. HerrmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State v. EugenioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API