Legal Opinion
Nash v. Village of Cedarhurst
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 19, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Village of Cedarhurst appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated April 30, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant.
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, *486on the law, with costs, the motion of the defendant Village of Cedarhurst is granted, and the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against that defendant.
The defendant Village of Cedarhurst…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- ITT Hartford Insurance v. Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Stern v. Inc. Village of Flower HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Amarante v. Village of TarrytownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Butts v. Village of Sag HarborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Gillan v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Skates v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Quiroz v. Inc. Village of CedahurstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hansen v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005