Legal Opinion

Quiroz v. Inc. Village of Cedahurst

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), dated February 1, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that it never received prior written notice of the defect in the walkway that allegedly caused the plaintiff Armando…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Cendales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Stern v. Inc. Village of Flower HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Demant v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Albright v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delgado v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Wilson v. Incorporated Vil. of FreeportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API