Legal Opinion

Fuhrman v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2003No. S-01-767PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

I. NATURE OF CASE

Taunia Fuhrman filed a petition under the State Tort Claims Act alleging the State of Nebraska; the Department of Health and Human Services, formerly known as the Department of Social Services (DHHS); and Pam Curry, a DHHS employee (collectively appellants), were liable to Fuhrman for damages she sustained on December 12,1995, when a ward of the State assaulted Fuhrman at Immanuel Medical Center (Immanuel) in Omaha, Nebraska. Following a bench trial, the Douglas County District Court entered judgment in Fuhrman’s favor in the amount of $171,829.59. Appellants filed this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Knoll v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sharkey v. Board of RegentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hill v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wilke v. Woodhouse Ford, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. ACI Worldwide Corp. v. Baldwin Hackett & MeeksNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Jill B. & Travis B. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API