Fuhrman v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.
I. NATURE OF CASE
Taunia Fuhrman filed a petition under the State Tort Claims Act alleging the State of Nebraska; the Department of Health and Human Services, formerly known as the Department of Social Services (DHHS); and Pam Curry, a DHHS employee (collectively appellants), were liable to Fuhrman for damages she sustained on December 12,1995, when a ward of the State assaulted Fuhrman at Immanuel Medical Center (Immanuel) in Omaha, Nebraska. Following a bench trial, the Douglas County District Court entered judgment in Fuhrman’s favor in the amount of $171,829.59. Appellants filed this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Sacco v. CarothersNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Knoll v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Sharkey v. Board of RegentsNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hill v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Wilke v. Woodhouse Ford, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- ACI Worldwide Corp. v. Baldwin Hackett & MeeksNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Jill B. & Travis B. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.