Legal Opinion
Landmark Bank v. MacHera
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 23, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-1931-YPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
Third-party defendants Robert H. Haines, III (“Haines”), Priscilla L. Baldwin (“Baldwin”), the R. Roberts Company (“Roberts”), and Ommen Associates Limit ed Partnership, Inc. (“Ommen Associates”) move this Court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (2) to dismiss the third-party claims asserted against them by Joseph J. Machera (“Machera”), third-party plaintiff and the defendant in the underlying case. The third-party defendants argue that the Court lacks both subject-matter and personal jurisdiction.
For the reasons that follow, the Court…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert S. Boit v. Gar-Tec Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Altavista Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Nahigian v. LeonardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- Grice v. VIM Holdings Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Fiske v. Sandvik MiningDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.