Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kenly v. Huntingdon Building Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 19, 1934No. [No. 50, October Term, 1933.]Published

1Concurrence

Digges, J.,

filed, a separate opinion as follows, in which Parke and Sloan, JJ., concurred.

I- concur fully in the conclusion reached by the majority opinion of this court for the reasons herein stated.

On May 23rd, 1933, the chancellor, in the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City, passed an order sustaining the -exceptions of the appellee to- the ratification of sale made under foreclosure proceedings by the appellant, who was the mortgagee and purchaser at said sale, and set aside- sale. From this order the appeal here was prosecuted.

The facts which the record discloses may be briefly but…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Magniac v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API