Legal Opinion
Hallas v. Town of Windsor
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 1, 1989No. 13567PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
This appeal arises from an action brought by the plaintiffs, Herbert Hallas and Mary Katz Moule, against the defendants, the town of Windsor, Windsor town manager Albert G. Ilg, Windsor director of finance Antoinette J. Anderson, and former Windsor director of finance Ruth Levine,1 alleging that appropriations made by the Windsor town council to fund two road construction projects in the town were in violation of the town charter.2 Specifically, the plaintiffs *340claimed that the town charter required the approving vote of the town meeting3 to validate the appropriations in question, and that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Reynolds v. VroomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Shays v. Local Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Foundry Co. v. International Ladies Garment Workers UnionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Waterbury Hospital v. Connecticut Health Care AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Carothers v. CapozzielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Domestic Violence Services of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.