Legal Opinion
Condon v. New Rochelle Water Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Action by Martin J. Condon against the New Rochelle Water Company. Judgment in part for each party pursuant to the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMills, J.
This is an action brought by the plaintiff, a resident and house owner and occupant in the village of Pelham Manor, Westchester county, against the defendant, to permanently enjoin the defendant from exacting from the plaintiff payment of charges for supplying water to plaintiff’s premises, within said village, in excess of certain specified rates, and also permanently enjoining the defendant from refusing to supply water to plaintiff’s said premises. To several of the *143separate defenses pleaded in the amended answer the plaintiff demurred. The issues of law and fact were brought to trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- City of Mount Vernon v. New York Inter Urban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- People ex rel. Village of Pelham Manor v. New Rochelle Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Terre Haute Paper Co. v. Terre Haute Water Works Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- Board of Fire Commissioners v. New York Interurban Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1920
- Condon v. New Rochelle Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Condon v. New Rochelle Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909