Legal Opinion
Board of Fire Commissioners v. New York Interurban Water Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Applications for peremptory writs of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Applications are made in these proceedings by two private consumers and the board of fire commissioners of the first fire district of the town of Pelham for peremptory writs of mandamus, directing respondent to lay mains and install hydrants in certain streets in' what is known as Pelham Heights.
Bespondent furnishes water for public and private use in the portion of the village of Pelham known as Pelham Heights under an agreement with the Pelham Heights Company, the owner of the streets in that section, dated March 31,' 1906. By the agreement the Pelham Heights Company sold to the respondent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pond v. . New Rochelle Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- McEntee v. . Kingston Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Farnsworth v. . Boro Oil Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Wainwright v. Queens County Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
- City of Mount Vernon v. New York Inter Urban Water Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926
- Morenken Building Corp. v. Long Island Water Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1930