Moreland v. Youngblood
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J.,
(after stating the facts). The practice in this State is that, where a defendant who has been constructively served seeks a new trial under the statute, he cannot have the judgment or decree vacated on the motion. The judgment or decree remains until the case is retried, to be then confirmed, modified, or set aside. Gleason v. Boone, 123 Ark. 523.
In the present case Ella Moreland showed no ground for setting aside the mortgage foreclosure proceedings. The proceedings themselves were regular in all respects. There was a valid mortgage and a subsisting debt due, which it was given to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gleason v. BooneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blanton Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of Marked TreeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- American Investment Co. v. GleasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Adams v. MitchellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- King v. Dickinson-Reed-Randerson CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Ragland v. RhoadsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.