Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Alan Schmall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 11, 1972No. 71-1807PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of refusing induction in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. He seeks reversal on two grounds.

1. The regulations provide that “A local board of three or more members shall be appointed . . ..” 32 C.F.R. § 1604.52(a). It is stipulated that only two of the normal complement of three members had been appointed to appellant’s local board when his claim for student deferment was rejected and he was classified I-A. Since both members joined in the action, however, appellant can suggest no prejudice. Cf. United States v. Gasca, 449 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Edward ReebCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. David Bruce GascaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen Haynes PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Allen Lyle HeinrichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Allen Lyle HeinrichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Dennis Le Roy CardwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Joseph Alan SchmallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API