Hogan v. Hearst Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
GREEN, Justice.
Bessie and Bill Hogan (the Hogans) appeal from the trial court’s granting of Hearst Corporation and Elisandro Garza’s motion for summary judgment. In four points of error, the Hogans assert that the trial court erred in overruling their special exceptions to Hearst and Garza’s motion for summary judgment and in granting the summary judgment.
Facts
On May 19, 1994, Benny Hogan was arrested for indecent exposure in San Antonio’s McAllister Park. On June 2, 1994, the San Antonio Express-News, owned by Hearst, ran an article written by Elisandro Garza on the various arrests made by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
- City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Express-News, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
- Crumrine v. Harte-Hanks Television, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
- Lowe v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.