Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Hearst Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 16, 1997No. 04-96-00326-CVPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Justice.

Bessie and Bill Hogan (the Hogans) appeal from the trial court’s granting of Hearst Corporation and Elisandro Garza’s motion for summary judgment. In four points of error, the Hogans assert that the trial court erred in overruling their special exceptions to Hearst and Garza’s motion for summary judgment and in granting the summary judgment.

Facts

On May 19, 1994, Benny Hogan was arrested for indecent exposure in San Antonio’s McAllister Park. On June 2, 1994, the San Antonio Express-News, owned by Hearst, ran an article written by Elisandro Garza on the various arrests made by…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Cathey v. BoothTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Knox v. Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  2. City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Express-News, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  3. Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2000
  4. Crumrine v. Harte-Hanks Television, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  5. Lowe v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API