In Re Caudillo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, Acting C. J.
This case presents a narrow question of statutory interpretation arising under the Uniform Determinate Sen*626tencing Act (DSL), a statutory enactment which substantially revised the sentencing procedure and length of sentences with regard to many of California’s criminal offenses. Under the DSL, the Legislature directed the Community Release Board (CRB)1 to recompute and revise the terms of prisoners sentenced under the earlier Indeterminate, Sentence Law (ISL) to correspond to the terms that the prisoners would have received if the DSL had been in force at the time…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. CaudilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re PrewittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. PaciniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. BrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. MontenegroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.