Legal Opinion

Heathwood Village Limited Partnership v. Groft

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 2023No. 1:22-cv-01229Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HEATHWOOD VILLAGE LIMITED : Civil No. 1:22-CV-01229-JPW PARTNERSHIP, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : MICHAEL GROFT, : : Defendant. : Judge Jennifer P. Wilson MEMORANDUM Before the court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, arguing that the prior pending action rule renders this action duplicative, and it is inappropriate for this case to proceed. (Doc. 2.) Alternatively, Defendant argues that Plaintiffs waived these claims. (Id.) For the following reasons, the court will grant the motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API