Legal Opinion

Solomon Mathis v. Lozier PER LTS PRO SE CAN SUBMIT FILINGS TO THE ECF EMAIL BOX - PER 11 MINUTES - PLT TO BE SERVED BY EMAIL

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided July 2, 2020No. 3:19-cv-03035Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION BERTHA I. SOLOMON MATHIS, Plaintiff, No. C19-3035-LTS vs. ORDER RICHARD W. LOZIER, JR., et al., Defendants. ___________________________ I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before me on a motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 5) filed by defendants Geri D. Huser, Nick Wagner and Richard W. Lozier, Jr. (defendants). Plaintiff Bertha Solomon Mathis has filed a resistance (Doc. No. 6) and defendants have filed a reply (Doc. No. 13). I find that oral argument is not necessary. See Local Rule 7(c). II. BACKGROUND On December 5,…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API