Legal Opinion
Smith v. Dixon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 1, 1965No. 5-3432PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Associate Justice.
The appellee, as purchaser, brought this action against appellants, as sellers, for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of realty and in the alternative sought damages for nonperformance of the contract.
The appellants are E. F. Smith, his wife, and their children and spouses. This entire family constitutes a business firm known as E. F. Smith & Sons, A Partnership. The “Contract For Sale Of Realty With Lease” was signed by one of the appellants, W. R. Smith, on behalf of the family partnership.
By the terms of the contract, executed in March 1962,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robbins v. PlantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Loveless v. DiehlSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- Hall v. WeeksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Bonner v. LittleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Braley v. Arkhola Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Harper v. Delaware Valley Broadcasters, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Rabalaias v. BarnettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Covington v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- National Lumber Co. v. Advance Development Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Boensch v. CornettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.