Desot v. Ross
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Macomb. (Canfield, J.) Bill for the discharge of a mortgage. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainant is- 0the father of the *82defendant. In March, 1881, complainant mortgaged certain premises owned and occupied by him to Oliver Chapaton for $1,022. This. mortgage was assigned to defendant in 1888. December 26, 1891, complainant tendered to the defendant $1,341.12, and demanded a discharge of the mortgage. The defendant refused to discharge the mortgage unless she was repaid the further sum of $150 and interest, which she had advanced to complainant to pay the installments of interest falling due upon the same mortgage ■ before she became the purchaser of it. The bill prays a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanford v. McLeanNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Kelly v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Brice v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. AltonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Palmer v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. Shorebank Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Leser v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Herpolsheimer v. Hansell-Elcock Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.