Legal Opinion
Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Alton
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 28, 2006No. Docket Nos. 264213, 264214PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTalbot, J.
Pursuant to MCR 7.215(J), this Court convened a special panel to resolve the purported conflict between this Court’s ruling in the consolidated cases comprising Ameriquest Mortgage Co v Alton, 271 Mich App 660; 726 NW2d 424 (2006), vacated in part 271 Mich App 801 (2006), and Washington Mut Bank, FA v ShoreBank Corp, 267 Mich App 111; 703 NW2d 486 (2005). This matter is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). We conclude that Washington Mut Bank was correctly decided and affirm the ruling in Ameriquest.
I. AMERIQUEST — FACTUAL HISTORY AND HOLDING
The consolidated cases in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- DiBenedetto v. West Shore HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Burkhardt v. BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Moyer v. Edlund (In Re Vandenbosch)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Richardson (In Re Brandt)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- First National Bank v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Thomas v. DutkavichMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.