Ginsberg v. Friedman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York, Trial Term. Action by Charles Ginsberg against Bernard Friedman. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
This action was brought to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment whereunder plaintiff was employed at a fixed salary per week from December 21, 1908, to November 1, 1909, plus 1 per cent, of the “amounts of cash actually paid to the party of the first part for merchandise sold by him during the said term.” It was also provided that the plaintiff should design cloaks and suits, “which shall at all times be to the satisfaction of the defendant,” who “shall be the sole judge thereof.” Plaintiff was discharged without cause, as he claims, in June, 1909.
Defendant’s principal…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gray v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Dunham v. Hastings Pavement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Haehnel v. TrostlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1907
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hill Cattle Corporation v. KillornMontana Supreme Court · 1927