Legal Opinion

Villar v. Kernan

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 11, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

[¶ 1] Pursuant to 4 M.R.SA § 57 (1989) and M.R.Civ.P. 76B, the United States District Court for the District of Maine (Hornby, *1222J.) has certified the following questions of state law to this Court:(1) Does Maine law, including but not limited to 13-A M.R.S.A. § 618, preclude an action for breach of an oral contract between two shareholders of a closely held corporation prohibiting their receipt of salaries from the corporation?(2) If the answer to the first question is “no,” what factors are to be considered in determining whether specific performance is available to take an oral…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Ulmer v. Lime Rock RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1904
  3. Dasha Ex Rel. Dasha v. Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  4. Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. Davis v. Scott Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API