Legal Opinion

Felix v. Hall-Brooke Sanitarium

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 15, 1953PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Sullivaw, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover damages under a complaint alleging a cause of action for assault and battery and one for false imprisonment. The answer was in the nature of a general denial. After the parties had rested, the court, upon motion, directed a verdict for the defendant upon the cause of action for false imprisonment but submitted to the jury the cause for assault and battery. They returned a defendant’s verdict. The plaintiff has appealed.

We first dispose of the assignment of error attacking the partial direction of the verdict. Technically, the direction of a verdict…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McGann v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Harrington v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Pettibone v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
  4. Peiter v. DegenringSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. EdmissonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  5. State v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API