Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1986No. JM-562Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE ATTOR;YEY GEXERLIL OF TEXAS Ocwber 16, 1986 Honorable H. Tati Santiesteban Opinion No. JM-562 Chairman Natural Resource Committee Re: Applicability of an energy Texas State Senate conservation code to areas which P. 0. Box 12068 are provided electric utility Austin, Texas 78711 service by a city but are out- side its corporate boundaries Dear Senator Santiesteban: You ask whether a home :culecity may enforce its energy conserva- tion code outside its boundaries but within its certified electric service area. You inform us that a home rule city adopted an energy conservation code pursuant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Austin v. JamailCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. City of Lubbock v. South Plains Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. City of New Braunfels v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Richmond Plaza Civic Ass'n v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Port Arthur Housing Co. v. City of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API