Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Jamail

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1983No. 13789PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRADY, Justice.

After hearing, the district court of Travis County dissolved the City of Austin’s temporary injunction, enjoining appellee from developing his land on the Lake Austin watershed within the City of Austin’s extraterritorial jurisdiction. The court also denied appellant City of Austin a permanent injunction, which would have required appellee to comply with City of Austin Ordinance No. 800103-N before further developing his land. The trial court held, in effect, that the City of Austin has no authority to enforce this ordinance within its five-mile extraterritorial jurisdiction. 1

A…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of West Lake Hills v. Westwood Legal Defense FundCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Pope v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. City of Sweetwater v. HamnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Estuary Properties, Inc. v. AskewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Pedersen v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of Lucas v. North Texas Municipal Water District, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
  2. Milestone Potranco Development, Ltd. v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009
  3. City of Lubbock v. Phillips Petroleum Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
  4. Harry Bizios v. Town of Lakewood Village, TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  5. Hope v. Village of Laguna VistaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API