In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of Melgaard
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentPeterson, Justice
1. The pleadings have been misconstrued by this court. Defendants asked leave upon the trial to amend the answer so as to grant affirmative relief, vacating and setting aside all the orders allowing the annual accounts and the consents upon which such orders were based, and the court expressly granted the motion to amend the pleadings in this respect. This being true, the answer as amended set up a counterclaim to vacate and set aside the orders and consents and to surcharge the trustees. A defendant who pleads a counterclaim is, as to the counterclaim, considered as if he had brought an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wilson v. HawthorneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Willing's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Horton v. StegmyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of RosenfeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.