Legal Opinion

Pyatt v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided April 7, 1941No. 751PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REEVES, District Judge.

In this case there is no question as to a diversity of citizenship nor an amount in controversy within the jurisdiction of the court. The question agitated is whether the plaintiff was notified in writing before the filing of petition and bond for removal, and, if not, whether this requirement of the statute is mandatory and jurisdictional.

At the arguments of the motion to remand the parties were in agreement that on the day the petition and bond for removal were filed a notice was posted addressed to counsel for plaintiff at Joplin, Missouri, and received by him the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hansford v. Stone-Ordean-Wells Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1912
  2. Miller v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  3. Goins v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1912
  4. Lewis v. Erie R.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Arthur v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kovell v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1954
  2. Bagby v. BartonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API