Neckel v. Department of Workforce Services
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Decision
PEARCE, Judge:
[ 1 George W. Neckel seeks judicial review of the Workforce Appeals Board's (the Board) decision denying his application for unemployment benefits. We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's factual determinations We also conclude that the Board's decision falls within the bounds of reasonableness and rationality. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Board's decision.
112 Neckel worked for Contempo Cabinet & Mill, Inc. (Contempo) as a cabinet maker. Throughout his employment with Contempo, Neckel had concerns regarding workplace safety and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jex v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Sawyer v. Department of Workforce ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Cook v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Chapman v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Carter v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. Workforce ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2025