Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jeannis

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 31, 2018No. AC 17-P-10PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRubin, J.

*1213 The defendant was convicted of possession of a class A substance (heroin) and possession of a class B substance (cocaine), and he now appeals. The issue he raises involves application of the rule announced in Rodriques v. Furtado , 410 Mass. 878 , 888, 575 N.E.2d 1124 (1991) ( Furtado ), allowing the manual search of a body cavity only with a warrant "issued by the authority of a judge, on a strong showing of particularized need supported by a high degree of probable cause," to a circumstance where police seek to remove an item partially protruding from an arrestee's rectum.

Background .…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. TorresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Hughes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. JeannisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API