Legal Opinion

In Re Kyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1947No. Crim. 2442PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus brought to recover the custody of a minor child. The writ having issued, a return was made thereto by the persons detaining the child, and the matter is now before the court for decision upon a demurrer and answer to the petition.

Petitioner Robert M. Kyle and respondent Adelaide E. Kyle, now Adelaide E. Wiedrick, were married on November 3, 1928. Of the marriage two children were born, Norma Jean Kyle and Robert S. Kyle. The present controversy concerns the custody of Norma Jean Kyle, now twelve years of age.

In 1941, Robert M. Kyle filed a suit for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Titcomb v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Bruguiere v. BruguiereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kelsey v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Warren v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Spellens v. SpellensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Rediker v. RedikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Leathers v. LeathersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API